Hopper & Transition Builder
Develop a rectangular hopper or duct transition into its four flat panels. Centred or offset, the panels are exactly planar, so each flat pattern is an exact unfolding rather than an approximation — and every panel has its own DXF.
Dimensions
Results
One file containing all four panels in a fixed layout with a 10 mm gap. A convenience arrangement, not a nest.
All panel dimensions
Preview
- Part
- Opening centres
- Offset and correspondence
Click a face to select that panel. The Plan view is the one that settles the offset — it shows both openings, both centres and the X and Y components separately.
Developed panel
Laid out with the bottom edge along the X axis from the origin, rising into +Y. Panels are never mirrored or rotated to suit a layout.
How this tool is verified
- Geometry checked against hand-derived golden cases and geometric invariants — developed arc equals true circumference, metric and imperial inputs give identical millimetre geometry.
- Every exported DXF is read back and audited by ezdxf, an independent DXF library that had no part in writing it (ezdxf 1.4.4).
- Output opened and accepted in Autodesk Inventor and AutoCAD on a real seat (2026-08-10).
The method, the reports and the responsibility boundary are on the Approach page.
Built by Ruthen Systems
The same geometry core powers custom generators for specific shops — your rules, your standards, your output formats. If you keep redoing this by hand with your own rules attached, that is the version worth having.
How a custom generator is builtAssumptions and limits
Read these before you cut anything. They describe exactly what this tool does and does not account for.
- Both openings are rectangular, axis-aligned, and lie in parallel planes. The top opening is not rotated relative to the bottom.
- The four side panels are exactly planar for any offset, so each developed panel is an exact isometry of the real panel — not a flattened approximation.
- Opening dimensions are developed exactly as entered. Thickness and corner-joint compensation are not applied automatically.
- Material and thickness are recorded as part details. Neither changes the developed geometry.
- No seam, edge or corner-joint allowance is added. The panels are theoretical net shapes, edge to edge.
- Panel areas are the developed sheet areas. They do not include the top or bottom openings.
- Geometry is nominal and deterministic from the values entered. Check against your own corner detail before cutting.
Output is a planning and fabrication aid. You are responsible for verifying dimensions, tolerances and material behaviour before production — full disclaimer.
Worked example
A centred hopper: 600 × 500 bottom, 200 × 150 top, 400 high.
- Front and back slant436.61 mm
- Left and right slant447.21 mm
- Front bottom / top edge600.00 / 200.00 mm
- Total panel area0.640 m²
Both slants are hand-checkable: √(175² + 400²) = 436.61 for the front and back, and √(200² + 400²) = 447.21 for the left and right. Centred, front matches back and left matches right exactly.
Method
The transition is modelled in three dimensions first. The bottom opening sits in the plane z = 0 centred on the origin; the top sits in z = H centred on the offset. Every panel, every view and every DXF comes from those eight corner points, so nothing on this page can disagree with anything else on it.
Why the panels are exactly flat
This is the property the whole tool rests on. Take the front panel: its bottom edge runs along X at the front of the bottom opening, and its top edge runs along X at the front of the top opening. Both are parallel to the X axis, so they are parallel to each other — and two distinct parallel lines always lie in a single plane. The same holds for all four panels, and nothing in that argument mentions the offset or the relative sizes.
So each panel is a planar trapezoid, and developing it is an isometry: the flat pattern has exactly the same edge lengths, diagonals and area as the real panel. There is no flattening error to quote because there is no flattening error.
Where that stops being true
Rotate the top opening and the two edges of a panel stop being parallel. The four corners then do not lie in one plane, and the piece can only be made by triangulating it into facets with genuine break lines, or by accepting a deviation tolerance — which is exactly the choice CAD packages present for a non-developable loft. The tool refuses rotation rather than approximating it. The same applies to round and square-to-round transitions, which are a different family solved by triangulation.
How each panel is developed
By distance geometry, from the six 3D distances between the panel's four corners alone. The first corner goes to the origin, the second onto the X axis at the true bottom-edge length, and the remaining two are placed by intersecting circles of the correct radii. Building it that way makes the result an isometry by construction and means a vertex cannot end up matched to the wrong corner — a failure mode that leaves the area and the overall shape looking perfectly correct while individual edges are wildly wrong.
Offsets, and why they are not restricted
Slice the transition at any height and the cross-section is a rectangle whose width and depth are straight-line interpolations between the two openings, and whose centre moves linearly. Both stay positive, so every slice is a proper rectangle and slices at different heights never meet. The surface cannot pass through itself, however far the top is offset — so large offsets are accepted, including one that puts the top opening entirely outside the bottom footprint.
Dimensions and thickness
Opening dimensions are developed exactly as entered. Thickness and corner-joint compensation are not applied automatically. A correction is derivable — it works out as half the thickness divided by the cosine of each panel's lean — but it differs per panel, stops being symmetric as soon as there is an offset, feeds back into the very leans it depends on, and above all depends on whether the corners are butt-welded, lapped or flanged. Applying one on your behalf would be guessing at your corner detail, so the tool develops what you enter and reports each panel's lean so you can apply your own.
Panels and files
Panels are named against the plan view: +X is Right, +Y is Back, Front is the −Y face. Each exports its own DXF containing one closed CUT outline and nothing else — no dimensions, no text, no construction lines. The combined file places all four in a fixed Front / Right over Back / Left arrangement with a constant 10 mm gap, translated only. It is a convenience layout and makes no claim to be a nest.
Questions
What shapes does this cover?
A transition between two rectangular openings lying in parallel planes, both axis-aligned, with any height and any horizontal offset. That covers centred hoppers, chutes, rectangular reducers and offset duct transitions. A centred hopper is simply the case where both offsets are zero — it is not a separate mode.
Is an offset transition still four flat panels?
Yes, always, and that is worth knowing rather than assuming. Each panel joins a bottom edge to the corresponding top edge, and both of those edges are parallel to the same axis — so they are parallel to each other, and two parallel lines always lie in one plane. The panel is therefore genuinely planar for any offset, and the flat pattern is an exact unfolding rather than an approximation. No triangulation is involved anywhere.
Why can I not rotate the top opening?
Because that is exactly where the argument above stops working. Rotate the top and the two edges of a panel stop being parallel, the four corners no longer lie in one plane, and the panel can only be made by triangulating it into facets with real break lines or by accepting a deviation tolerance. Rather than quietly approximate that, the tool refuses it. Half a degree of rotation is already enough to break planarity.
Can the top opening sit outside the bottom footprint?
Yes. Large offsets are geometrically valid and develop exactly, so they are accepted rather than rejected — you get a note pointing it out, in case it was a typo. Every horizontal slice through the transition is still a plain rectangle, so the surface can never run into itself however far the top is shifted.
Are the dimensions inside or outside the finished part?
Opening dimensions are developed exactly as entered. Thickness and corner-joint compensation are not applied automatically. The right correction depends on how you join the corners — butt-welded, lapped or flanged all want something different, and it also differs per panel once the sides lean at different angles. Rather than guess a corner detail on your behalf, the tool develops exactly what you type and leaves that decision with you.
What does thickness change?
Nothing in the geometry. It is recorded as a part detail and travels into the DXF comment. The same applies to the material selector: it labels the part and does not set a density, a K-factor or any allowance.
Which panel is which?
Panels are named against the plan view: +X is Right, +Y is Back, so Front is the −Y face. The same name is used in every view, in the results table, in the individual DXF filename and in the DXF comment. With an offset all four panels are different shapes, so an unlabelled one is a scrapped plate.
How are the developed panels oriented?
Each developed panel is laid out with its bottom edge along the X axis from (0, 0), rising into +Y, traversed in the same direction as the anticlockwise plan walk. Panels are never mirrored or rotated to suit a layout. Because a panel is a plain quadrilateral with no features, flipping the plate gives you the other hand if you need it.
What is in the combined DXF?
All four panels in one file, in a fixed Front / Right over Back / Left arrangement with a constant 10 mm gap. It is a convenience layout, not a nest — no packing, no rotation, no mirroring, and no attempt to save material. Each panel is identical to its individual file apart from being translated into place.
Does it add a seam or edge allowance?
No. The panels are theoretical net shapes, edge to edge. A seam allowance only means something once the corner joint is decided, and inventing one would be guessing at your shop standard.
Need this against your own standard transitions?
This page is a worked example of the kind of thing we build: fabrication geometry turned into a repeatable, deterministic workflow. The version that earns its keep in a shop knows your corner detail and seam rules, your layer names, your title block and your part numbering, and runs across a family of hoppers rather than one at a time. Send one transition you lay out repeatedly and we will tell you straight whether automating it is worth doing.
Related tools
Cone / Frustum Configurator
Flat pattern with inside/outside dimension basis, plate-roll or press-brake forming, bend angles and out-of-round — plus a clean DXF.
Open the tool →Pipe Cut Template Builder
Wrap-around templates for angled pipe ends and pipe-to-pipe saddles, with the export deviation stated rather than assumed.
Open the tool →Sheet Metal Profile Builder
Build a multi-bend open profile from segments and bends. Live formed section, live flat pattern, and a DXF blank with a directed centreline per bend.
Open the tool →Single Bend Flat Pattern Configurator
Flat length and bend line from your finished flanges — with an explicit datum, a formed section you can check against, and a DXF blank.
Open the tool →Flange / Bolt Circle DXF Generator
Lay out a bolt circle from OD, ID, PCD, hole size and count. Get exact hole coordinates and a DXF with centrelines.
Open the tool →